<![CDATA[Two Recycle Inc. - News]]>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 08:41:36 -0600Weebly<![CDATA[US Patent Pending - Separation lead from glass]]>Sun, 03 Dec 2017 07:16:33 GMThttp://two-recycle.com/news/us-patent-pending-separation-lead-from-glassOur process to separate the lead from the glass is filed.

The proces is under review of the EPA and in the meanwhile we will export the overload of leaded glass out of the country through certified exporters. 
We are talking with the large OEM collectors of CRT's to develop the best downstream of the old tv's and monitors which are still many left throughout the USA.

If you are a collector, call today with Steve Opachinski to arrange the best certified downstream for your CRT.

Thanks and we wish you a great day,
​TWO Recycle Inc.
​]]>
<![CDATA[CRTs Challenge the public and private sectors]]>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 20:00:57 GMThttp://two-recycle.com/news/crts-challenge-the-public-and-private-sectorsPosted on  October 12, 2017


by Colin Staub

Sarah Murray of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources speaks at E-Scrap 2017.
When it comes to CRT management, the profit is shaky and the industry is littered with horror stories of stockpiles and legal battles to determine who pays for cleanup.

But a company can take steps to avoid those pitfalls if it completes its fair share of due diligence and then some, according to an expert who spoke during a session at E-Scrap 2017 titled “Bearing the Weight of CRTs.”
“If you’re not familiar with the risk, don’t be in this business as a collector,” said Joe Connors, vice president of business development for Greensburg, Pa.-based CyberCrunch.
The session, moderated by Jeff Bednar of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, also touched on current regulatory changes, as well as the downstream outlets available for CRT management.
‘Caught in the middle’Connors offered perspective from a private sector CRT collector, including some tips to avoid the risks of the business. The key downfall that can trip up a collector is its downstream, Connors said, specifically determining whether it’s legitimate.
“Go and visit, identify what they’re doing with it, so you are knowledgeable with it,” Connors said.
Continuous monitoring of a company’s downstream outlets is essential, he said. If trouble arises and a company doesn’t take note, it could lose money in the eventual fallout.
“My suggestion as a collector is don’t get caught in the middle,” Connors said. “That’s a recipe for disaster.”
Once a stockpile or downstream collapse occurs, collectors can get tangled in the cleanup, which can turn into a messy process. Connors described phone calls he receives from landlords who are stuck stockpiles from failed CRT outlets and are looking to get it cleaned up. But often, they don’t grasp how that works.
“When they find out there’s a cost, they just hang up the phone,” he said. “Fact of life, that will not change.”
Joe Connors of CyberCrunch speaks at E-Scrap 2017.
Connors advised companies to communicate with the agencies regulating CRT recycling. They can help companies become familiar with the law, as well as determine the legitimacy of a downstream.
“It is a quagmire out there,” he said. “It is very, very difficult to understand.”
Public sector challengesSarah Murray of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources identified some of the factors that contribute to industry risks in her state’s recycling program.
Under Wisconsin law, manufacturers of TVs, computers, monitors, printers and other devices register with the state and are assigned a weight-based recycling target. The target, which prescribes how much material they must pay to collect and recycle, is 80 percent of the weight of products sold during the given sales period.
CRT TVs have dominated Wisconsin’s recycling stream for the past five years and made up 60 percent of the weight of collected devices during the most recent program year. CRT computer monitors, on the other hand, have substantially dropped off, from 20 percent of the stream when the program began to about 5 percent currently.
Wisconsin does not mandate free CRT recycling for consumers, Murray said, meaning recycling companies can charge fees to collectors, who can, in turn, pass them on to consumers.
“At the consumer level, there’s virtually no place in the state where you can recycle a TV for free,” Murray said. “There’s just a few communities, maybe, that are still subsidizing the cost.”
Rising costs have led consumers and smaller collectors, including local governments, to seek cheaper “alternative” outlets for CRTs to avoid paying the fee. “If not outright illegal dumping by consumers, then finding low-cost recyclers,” Murray said.
In Wisconsin, those low-cost alternatives have led to CRT stockpiles requiring costly cleanup and environmental remediation.
Another challenge is monitoring and tracking the CRT glass and its source. Recycling companies might receive CRTs from in-state and out-of-state, and it often gets mixed together during the processing phase. That means it’s difficult to determine the upstream source of CRT glass once it’s been processed and sent to a downstream outlet.
When a CRT stockpile develops, the lack of tracking information presents problems in holding upstream players accountable for the material.
The program also has challenges determining what constitutes “recycling” when it comes to CRTs. Per state statute, recycling means “preparing eligible electronic devices for use in manufacturing processes or for recovery of usable materials and delivering the materials for use.” Although that makes it clear land disposal is not recycling, it leaves some other avenues ambiguous. And in many cases, the department can’t visit the downstream outlet to witness firsthand whether it’s legitimate or not – many are overseas – leaving it to evaluate as best it can from afar and rely on guidance from the U.S. EPA.
The department has drawn a hard line against allowing long-term storage to count as CRT recycling.
“By that, we often mean a process that’s not up and running, that says they need to accumulate feedstock,” Murray said. “If it’s just going to be going and sitting in storage for a few years, we’re saying manufacturers can’t get credit for that.”
What are the CRT outlets?Four years ago, Wisconsin’s e-scrap program began asking its recycling contractors about their downstream CRT outlets, and the responses have produced a timeline of how CRT processing has changed. When the surveys began, the majority of respondents said they sent CRTs for glass-to-glass use.
In 2014, India-based glass-to-glass operation Videocon was the program’s main downstream, Murray said.
“Almost every recycler we had was using them for at least some of their glass under the program,” she said.
But that changed the following year, when glass-to-glass began drying up and there was uncertainty about Videocon’s future.
The majority of CRT glass has gone to tile manufacturing during the past two program years, Murray said, to Camacho Recycling in Spain and to Brazil, through Com2 Recycling Solutions.
Smelting has been a fairly steady outlet, Murray said. Doe Run was taking Wisconsin’s CRTs for smelting when the program began, she said, but Glencore Recycling is now its primary outlet. Doe Run continues to take CRTs from other programs.
Other downstream outlets include aggregate made from CRT panel glass and concrete blocks incorporating CRT glass, as is being done in the Netherlands.
Domestically, CRTs are not considered hazardous waste as long as they are sent to a smelter or glass-to-glass manufacturer and are not speculatively accumulated, explained Lia Yohannes, from the EPA’s Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery. But there are limited domestic outlets for CRT materials, as Wisconsin’s program has demonstrated through information it’s compiled for the past few years.
CRT exports are regulated by the EPA, which recently finalized updates to its hazardous waste export regulations. The new language brings new requirements for CRT exporters, Yohannes explained.
Under the revisions, completed last year, exporters have to file information for each CRT shipment, detailing the destination country and its consent to receive the materials.
“This is going to improve our ability to track exports on a shipment-by-shipment basis,” Yohannes said.]]>
<![CDATA[September 02nd, 2017]]>Sun, 03 Sep 2017 04:45:36 GMThttp://two-recycle.com/news/september-02nd-2017Closed Loop execs ordered to pay millions in Ohio
Posted on  August 8, 2017
by Bobby Elliott

The former leaders of CRT outlet Closed Loop Refining and Recovery have been directed by a court to pay more than $18 million for breaking the lease at the company’s Columbus, Ohio headquarters and leaving behind more than 100 million pounds of CRT glass.

The decision, reached Monday afternoon by Judge Michael Holbrook of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, found David Cauchi, Brent Benham and Brian LaPoint liable for the largest abandonment of CRT glass in U.S. history. Closed Loop, which was started by the trio in 2010 and also maintained extensive operations in Arizona, closed last year.
The Columbus headquarters of Closed Loop, which spanned two sprawling warehouse spaces and is owned by commercial real estate firm Garrison Southfield Park, still holds 113 million pounds of crushed mixed CRT glass and an additional 15 million pounds of other e-scrap material, according to court documents.
“Closed Loop was not engaged in legitimate CRT recycling operations at the properties, but was instead engaged in the speculative accumulation and subsequent abandonment and disposal of the CRT waste at the properties without any feasible means of recycling it,” Judge Holbrook wrote in his Aug. 7 judgment.
Cauchi, Benham and LaPoint had earlier indicated they would represent themselves in the case, which began Aug. 2, but none appeared in court for the trial, according to Darcy Shaffer, a staff attorney at the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas.
Dennis Hall, the longtime Arizona attorney for Closed Loop and its former leaders, did not respond to multiple requests for comment. Benham and Cauchi also did not respond to requests for comment.
Cleanup estimated at $14 millionThe case was originally brought against Closed Loop in March 2016. Judge Holbrook ruled in Garrison’s favor earlier this year after Closed Loop failed to respond to the lawsuit. The case went to trial to determine the liability of Cauchi, Benham and LaPoint and to set damages in the case.
Holbrook ultimately awarded Garrison $3.98 million for the broken lease and another $14.18 million in estimated expenses for cleanup efforts needed at the Columbus site. NovoTec Recycling, which is also based in Columbus, Ohio, provided Garrison with the cleanup cost estimate, court documents show.
The court also awarded Garrison $224,601 for unpaid use and occupancy fees at the property, utility costs and attorney fees.
The ruling can be appealed.
Cauchi, Benham and LaPoint incorporated Closed Loop in Arizona in March 2010. The company was incorporated in Ohio two years later.
Despite the firm’s public commitment to building a furnace to recycle CRT glass, Closed Loop never developed the technology and ended up closing multiple sites in Ohio and Arizona in 2016, as E-Scrap News first reported at the time.
Closed Loop was paid significant sums to accept CRTs from a wide array of sources, including state electronics recycling programs funded by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), independent recycling companies and the federal government.
In addition to the Columbus headquarters, Closed Loop leased another space in Columbus that was not owned by Garrison and was not part of the lawsuit. That site has additional CRT material in storage, although it is not known how much material is currently stored there.
As of June 2016, Closed Loop had also abandoned over 50 million pounds of leaded CRT glass and another 4.5 million pounds of whole CRT devices at three locations in Arizona.]]>